How White Label Bookkeeping Is Priced: 4 Models Compared
How white label bookkeeping providers charge Australian accounting firms — hourly, fixed per file, dedicated team member and per transaction — what each model rewards, and how to compare quotes fairly.
When an Australian accounting firm asks white label providers for quotes, the numbers often cannot be compared. One quotes by the hour, another per client file, a third offers a dedicated team member, and a fourth charges by transaction volume. The headline rate matters less than what the model rewards. This guide explains the four common models, where each works, and how to compare them on the same basis.
We do not publish rates here. The right number depends on file condition, software, turnaround and volume, and it should come from a quote based on your real work.
1. Hourly
You pay for time recorded against each job. Hourly pricing suits work that is hard to scope upfront: catch-ups, file clean-ups, and one-off projects where nobody knows what the file looks like until someone opens it.
The risk is that you carry all the uncertainty. A slow provider costs more, and you need timesheets detailed enough to see where the hours went. If you choose hourly, agree an estimate per job and a point at which the provider must check in before going over it.
2. Fixed fee per file or per job
You agree a price for a defined deliverable: monthly reconciliation of one client file, one BAS draft, one year-end workpaper file. This is the easiest model to pass through to your own fixed-fee client engagements, because your cost per client is known in advance.
Fixed fees only work when scope is tight. Agree what is included (number of bank accounts, transaction bands, payroll, receivables), what counts as out of scope, and what happens when a client's file arrives in poor condition. Many providers price the first month or a catch-up separately before moving a file onto a fixed monthly fee.
3. Dedicated team member
You reserve a full-time or part-time person who works on your clients only, following your checklists. This suits firms with steady volume across many clients, and firms that want someone who learns their standards in depth.
The trade-off is commitment. You pay for capacity whether or not you fill it, so it works best once you know your baseline volume. Ask how leave and sick days are covered, who reviews the dedicated person's work, and how quickly you can scale up for BAS quarters or after 30 June.
4. Per transaction
Price scales with the number of bank lines or documents processed. It looks objective and suits high-volume, low-complexity files such as e-commerce or retail with heavy bank feeds.
It can reward volume over judgement. Coding a thousand clean feed lines is quick; resolving twenty unclear transactions takes longer and matters more. If you use this model, check how the provider handles exceptions and whether the query log is included.
What each model rewards
- Hourly rewards thoroughness, and also slowness, so you need visibility of time
- Fixed per file rewards efficiency, so you need clear scope and quality checks
- Dedicated team member rewards consistency, so you need enough steady volume to fill the time
- Per transaction rewards throughput, so you need exception handling built in
How to compare quotes fairly
Turn every quote into the same unit: your cost per client per month, or per job type. Send each provider the same sample: two or three real files described by software, bank accounts, transaction volume, payroll and current condition. Then compare what each quote includes.
- Is the first month or catch-up priced separately?
- Are BAS drafts, payroll checks and the query log included or extra?
- Who reviews the work before it reaches you?
- What turnaround is included, and what does faster turnaround cost?
- How are BAS-quarter and EOFY peaks handled?
- Is there a minimum commitment or notice period?
- Is the trial file free, and on a real client?
Hidden costs that sit with your firm
The provider's invoice is only part of the cost. Your reviewer's time is the other part. A cheaper provider whose work needs heavy correction costs more than a dearer one whose files arrive review-ready. During a trial, record how long your reviewer spends on each file. That number tells you more than the rate.
Factor in onboarding too: writing standing instructions, setting up access, and explaining your templates. Good providers reduce this by capturing your instructions once and applying them to every file.
Which model fits your firm?
- Testing outsourcing for the first time: start with a free trial file, then a fixed fee on a few files
- Fixed-fee client engagements: fixed per file, so your margin is predictable
- Twenty or more steady monthly clients: consider a dedicated team member
- Catch-ups and clean-ups: hourly with an agreed estimate, then a fixed monthly fee once the file is current
Whichever model you choose, keep lodgement and sign-off with your firm as the registered agent, and make sure the provider works inside your files rather than its own systems. Pricing is easy to renegotiate later. Losing control of your client data is not.
Related services
See the work on one of your own files
NDA first, then a free trial file in your Xero or MYOB. We respond within 12 hours.